His Servants' Ministry

The BIBLE has the answer

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

We serve our Lord and Master willingly with faith, love, honor and gratitude.
We appreciate and thank Him for all He has done for us.

>

 

The BIBLE has the answer

<><><><><><><>

Hell

<><><><><><><>

Apostasy

<><><><><><><>

Cults

<><><><><><><>

False Teachers

<><><><><><><>

Natural Disasters

<><><><><><><>

About Us

The Truth About Salvation

What We Believe

<><><><><><><>

Damnable Heresies

<><><><><><><>

An Apostate World

Charismatics

Corrupt Modern Bibles

Culkts Dangerous to Your Soul

Decisions We Make in This Life

Earthquakes

False Doctrines

False Teachers

Hate Groups

"ISRAEL"

<><><><><><><>

There Really is a HELL!

HELL

<><><><><><><>

Judgment Day shall come!

Are YOU ready?

Judgment Coming

Books You Should Read

Home Page

<><><><><><><>

We do not copyright anything. All material on this web site is here to provide free Biblical information. Anyone may freely use any or all the information present, to honor and glorify our awesome Triune God. All material here must remain free to "whosoever."

<><><><><><><>

 

 

 

 

HIS SERVANTS' MINISTRY

www.worldlychaos.org

Welcome to our website

What A Debt Default Would Mean
For National Security

By Richard Fontaine, Opinion Contributor - 05/22/23 2:00 PM ET
Over the past several years, American political leaders have rightly focused on augmenting national power. Faced with China’s geopolitical challenge, Washington has boosted its defense budget, stimulated domestic innovation, built new international partnerships, and moved to protect its technological lead. These steps have won broad support in both parties and across very different presidential administrations, and for good reason: A more powerful United States, working ever more closely with likeminded partners, is best placed to engage in long-term competition with Beijing.

In this context, the possibility of a default on U.S. debt — which Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen warns could occur as soon as June 1 — seems utterly mystifying. Defaulting on the nation’s debt threatens catastrophic economic consequences and would seriously harm national security. It’s hard to think of a single American action that would more effectively reduce its global standing, influence and power — and boost those of its chief competitor.

The economic consequences of a default are real and well-rehearsed. An inability to pay federal bills would roil financial markets and likely tip the United States into recession. It would increase interest rates and borrowing costs. It would harm American credibility, encourage diversification away from U.S. bonds, and threaten the dollar’s role as the world’s preeminent reserve currency. Military strength and geopolitical influence rise and fall with a country’s economic power, and a debt default would strike a major blow against them all.

It would also degrade America’s ability to effectively employ its foreign policy tools. The dollar’s extensive use to settle accounts gives Washington extensive powers to impose financial sanctions. By undermining confidence in the dollar, a default would likely encourage countries to denominate trade and financial transactions in other currencies, and to hold non-dollar official reserves as well. Already, Beijing has encouraged its trade partners to invoice in renminbi and is developing an alternative to the dollar-dominated SWIFT financial messaging network. Such moves would erode Washington’s ability to impose the kind of economic sanctions it applied after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

A default could have negative effects on military power as well. Defense represents the largest category of federal discretionary spending, and a disruption in the government’s ability to pay bills would harm readiness and investment. Pentagon leaders have begun warning about their potential inability to pay troops on time, and the uncertainty could delay the production of key weapons systems. The House has already postponed its consideration of this year’s defense authorization bill while debt ceiling negotiations proceed.

The near-term diplomatic costs are starting to pile up as well. President Biden, tied down in debt negotiations in Washington, cancelled his scheduled visit to Papua New Guinea and his attendance at the Quad meeting in Australia. A decade ago, President Obama missed the APEC leader’s meeting and the East Asian Summit in order to deal with a government shutdown at home; allies fretted at America’s absence while Beijing crowed. Today the stakes are higher, and allies already worry about American presence and leadership.

That points to perhaps the gravest national security consequence of a debt default. In the contest with China, Washington asks allies to cast their economic and security lots with the United States. For those would-be partners, the choice amounts to a bet on the future of American power and competence.

Washington has, however, provided ample fodder for hesitation in recent years: political polarization, the January 6 Capitol attacks and Washington’s crisis-prone decision-making invites questions about America’s ability to generate national solutions. The messy end to wars in Afghanistan and Iraq suggest strategic incompetence and a reluctance to match national security means to our stated ends. The enduring trend toward protectionism and America First-style economic policy is spawning questions among allies about where exactly their interests fit in U.S. decision-making.

Such doubts are naturally catnip to China, America’s chief competitor. Beijing portrays the West as in terminal decline, led by an increasingly divided United States unable to deliver the world — or even its own people — the unity and effectiveness they desire. America continues to coast, Chinese leaders suggest, on the privileges it accrued during a unipolar moment, including dollar dominance, the ability to impose sanctions, disproportionate influence in international institutions, and unrestrained military power. This dynamic, they say, is an artifact of yesterday’s world, and no longer reflective of a rising China and dysfunctional America. It reflects, instead, the antiquated disarray of Western democracies, in contrast to efficient and effective autocracy. A debt default would provide enormous ammunition to those pushing the narrative of American decline.

Given the massive downsides, an actual default is very unlikely. Both Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy and President Biden insist that defaulting on the nation’s debt is “not an option.” But unlikely is not impossible. In 2011, the Budget Control Act established a penalty — massive, indiscriminate spending cuts — designed to be so severe that Republicans and Democrats would have no choice but to agree on a deal that would avoid them. A nice concept, but one that failed utterly: “sequestration” spending caps harmed America’s defense for years. Today’s game of chicken is far more dangerous. The recognition of a default’s costs is no guarantee that we will avoid one.

AMERICA . . . Do You KNOW the Trouble You Are In?

Be_Careful_How_You_Walk

A_Warning_to_Skepticals

America's_Border_Crossing_Mess

America's_Biggest_Threat

America's_Worst_Danger

America's_Eclipse_of_God

America's_Growing_Threats

Our_Laodicea_Church

The_Philadelphia_Church

Rampant_Apostasy

Big_Trouble_Since_Biden_Took_Office

Supreme_Court's_Judicial_Assault

Supreme_Court's_Battles

America_NOT_Near_Enough_to_God

We_Should_Stand_On_the_Solid_Rock

Walls_DO_Work

What_A_Debt_Default_Would_Mean

Home Page

 

The BIBLE has the answer